itsbobcat wrote:
Sorry gals, there is no better proof than the Finals where each conference sends their best to compete. It was a sweep of the best the North had to offer, no denying that fact. The Southern Conference team completely dominated the best team the North had to offer. Now we all know the true finals were in the South, where the two best teams went at it and the better team won in 7 games while the Bucks remain the 2nd best team in the league for the 07-08 season. Think of it this way, it's a whole new season starting today and you can once again believe you have the best team in the entire league and don't forget to use those massey ratings because we know how much that proved. I enjoying proving my point time after time. You got to admit, serving up this crow season after season has become a complete joy.![]()
5 seasons in a row gals!![]()
Just curious how it was determined the bucks were the second best team? In the south I would agree, but in the league? I don't think that statement can
be justified. Didn't the bucks have a losing season vs the north?









